Skip to main content

Analysis of Sarojini Naidu's Queen’s rival


Sarojini Naidu Queen’s rival

There is a strong impact of Islam and Persian poetry on Sarojini Naidu’s poetry. The richness of her poetry is Romantic and Persian and Islamic culture appealed to her.


The Queen’s Rival has a wispy plot drawn from Persian legend, told in the narrative vein of the folk-ballad. It deals with a single situation,revealed dramatically, with the utmost simplicity and economy of expression. Yet, in its wistful sense of aspiration, melancholy and pathos, in the midst of super abundant opulence, splendour and glory, the poem is alyric with balladlike overtones. Readers are plunged into the action. The conclusion avoids a supernatural intervention, but propels the natural towards a magical return to origins, which outclasses life from the ordinary with joy and fulfilment.

   Queen Gulnaar is tired of her beauty, the empty splendour and shadowless bliss of her sheltered royalty. Her peerless beauty has made her a lonely, tantalized figure. She must have a rival, discover an objective correlative in experience other than her own body, measuring against which she can achieve self-definition and estimate her own real worth. She is like Nilambuja of the poet’s prose fantasy, standing in the desert of her own lonely temperament, seeking a foothold in the eternal
beauty of the universe, but unable to overcome the pattern of interrupted acts her life had assumed.

“But still she gazed in her mirror and sighed

“O king, my heart is unsatisfied”.

The Queen is tired of her beauty, tired of the empty splendour around her, tired of the shadow less bliss. There is nobody to envy her, to contradict her, to press her own claims against her. She wants someone to feel jealous of her charms, of her magnificence, of the unbounded love, which King Feroz bestows upon her. What she wants is a rival to compete with her, clash with her, because competition and complicit add to the zest and saves the life. Therefore, the queen, Gulnaar sighs like a murmuring rose, and asks the King to give her a rival.

But King Feroz, in his passionate infatuation for his Queen, does not understand what the Queen, out of her oriental modesty, is hinting at.He sends for his chief advisor and orders him to search for seven beautiful brides for him.
   King Feroz acquires seven handmaids for his Queen. Gazing in the aphrodisiac mirror, she still finds in it only her narcissistic image, evanescent, partial and

incomplete and aliented. The Queen is sternly

unsatisfied. The real cannot match the ideal. It has no continuity. It stands on its own pedestal of accumulations and lacks succession, relation and meaning.

 “I tire of my beauty, I tire of this Empty splendour and shadowless bliss



Prior to the concluding part of the poem, the poetess highlights a delicate psychological point that any power, prosperity or beauty if vested in one person becomes the cause of dissatisfaction at long. Rivalry in any field or aspect of life is the most essential factor for mental happiness and satisfaction. Monopoly, at long last, becomes like boredom. Human mind always longs for competition. It is the human nature that wishes that the efficiency, richness, strength, capability or beauty should be challenged by somebody. One should have opportunity of being tested one’s own worthiness of merits. Here, the Queen Gulnaar is unhappy in absence of any rival in case of her beauty. She was not satisfied with the rivalry of seven queens. When the poem seems advancing to its end, a turning point arises all of a sudden. Gulnaar is then lucky enough to have a powerful competitor. Her competitor is nobody else but her two years old daughter herself.

One day, Queen Gulnaar’s two year old daughter was adorned with precious dress. The child, like a fairy in a forest, rushed to the Queen and snatched the mirror away from her hand.. Then the child quickly wore her mother’s hair-band. Suddenly, with a child-like move, she planted happily a kiss on the mirror. Queen Gulnaar laughed like a quivering rose, saying, “O King Feroz, look, here is my rival”.

Summing up, Gulnaar realized that her daughter was the real rival of hers. Then the poem dramatically ends with the reality of life that the parents are always happy when they see their young ones playing and doing various innocent actions and tricks around them. The poetess has successfully presented the psychological point of mothering and motherhood through these sonnet-like three parts of the poem.

It’s no secret that the bond between a mother and daughter can be stronger than either might like; and this relationship is where a daughter first feels safe enough to really test her skills at self-assertion. Children come into this world fully dependent on others to meet their basic needs; however, the drive for independence asserts itself early and most of us spend the rest of our lives learning to balance our innate drives for dependence and independence. These two polarizing needs may give rise to a new mother-daughter battle across the life span at virtually each new life stage.

‘The Queen’s Rival’,as Sarojini Naidu confessed to Amarnath Jha, was the only poem which did not ‘come’ to her The conclusion was added as a delayed response to a friend’s narration of the Persian poetry. It is tender composition, full of insight into the feminine psychology of growth and differentiation. The folk-conclusion of the poem presents a typical resolution of adult conflict. It offers the play-instinct as a palliative to individual aggression and the consequent feeling of isolation and anxiety. The individual, who, by chance or choice, loses his sense of connection with life, is restored to reality.
The ballad structure, with the iterative situations, repeated words, images and symbols, the incremental refrains, the free flow of the verse and above all, the unsophisticated narrative and the folk-flavour of the story-line, lends a natural grace to the lyrical vision of adolescent experience and childhood innocence. The mother’s understandable

shock of recognition of her own daughter’s budding individuality has the quality of folk-drama, usually associated with the puberty-rites observed in the Indian villages.

These rites celebrate growth and change. Shock and crisis are overcome by nurturing a sense of social connection and continuity in the emerging personality of the individual.
Along with her daughter, the mother too grows up, stepping gracefully out of the cocoon of her own self-created world into the flux and process of life

The roles assigned to the woman in folk-culture are strategic compensations. Through these she fulfils her ego-ideal and her symbolic status, as the embodiment of disinterested love. In the poem, the action moves progressively from narcissistic desire towards hieratic power, from self to breed.
This poem is of romantic superfluity, colourful fancy and pleasing conceit. It has the dazzle of a multicoloured jewel, the tremulous pattern of a seven-petalled rose and the colour symphony of a painted natural scene. Queen Gulnaar’s state of mind touches on the abnormal. It passes from the consciousness of the possession

of beauty to the conceit about the possession of beauty. The conceit destroys her happiness and all the resources of a kingdom do not restore it to her. The poem suggests the deeper meaning that ultimately satisfaction for a frustrated soul comes from within

Comments

Trending

The Humiliation of Draupadi

The Humiliation of Draupadi Born from the sacred sacrificial fire of Yagya , Yagaseni, better known as Draupdi, the heroine of the Indian epic Mahabharata seems to be walking through fire throughout her life. She was won by Arjuna, who was disguised as a Brahmin at a Swyamvara . But immediately after her Swyamvara a terrible fight breaks out, hinting that she may became a cause of much bloodshed in future. She was married to five brothers without consulting her. The epic gives many justifications for her polyandry. But the epic also states that all the five brothers lusted after her. “…after those princes of immeasurable energy had looked at Draupadi, the God of desire invaded their hearts and continued to crush all their senses….the ravishing beauty of Panchali… had been modeled by the creator himself” (Adi Parva, Section CLXLIII) As all the brother had lusted after her, she was married to all of them to avoid any conflict among them.  One can imagine the p

An analysis of Gieve Patel's On Killing a Tree

                   On Killing a Tree - A representation of man’s cruelty to Nature.       Patel’s “On Killing a Tree” is a poem which presents a graphic picture of the total annihilation of a tree. In the poem the tree symbolizes Nature. Modern man out of his indiscriminate greed and selfishness roots out nature and its very spirit. Man’s greed is not quenched by the mere physical process of killing a tree.Man realizes that it is not easy to kill a tree because it has grown slowly consuming the earth and absorbing water, air and sunrise for years. The mere act of hacking and chopping is not sufficient to kill a tree. The tree overcomes man’s onslaught by branching off small stems close to the ground and resumes life and grose again to its former size.      Knowing a tree’s power to come to life again, man decides to pull out the root of the tree. Like a butcher, he makes several cuts in the tree and cuts it down. He then cuts it into several convenient pieces. Still hi

Study Notes on U.R. Anantha Murthy Samskara

Dharma in Samskara In Hinduism, a person is offered many paths towards salvation depending on his or her caste. The only toll to pay on this path is that of dharma, or duty. If one fulfills one’s dharma, then one comes closer to liberation ( moksa ). For a woman, this means obeying her husband. For a brahmin man, this means living his life according to the four life-stages ( asramas ) and practicing the vedic rituals. In the novel, Samskara , U.R. Anantha Murthy contrasts many possible paths to salvation including that of Naranappa and that of Praneshacharya; at first glance, a sinner and a saint. However, throughout the novel it becomes less clear who, if either, of these two is actually performing their dharma. I do not believe that either Naranappa nor Praneshacharya are successful at performing the dharma of a brahmin man because neither fulfilled both the life stages and the performance of the rituals. Dharma can be loosely translated to mean "duty... religion... ju